Opinion: In the high-stakes world of politics, economic myths aren’t just misunderstandings—they’re powerful tools. Politicians use these myths to influence public opinion, sway voters, and push policies.
But what if these so-called economic “truths” are actually crafted deceptions? Here are 10 of the most pervasive economic myths that politicians count on you to believe.
1. “We can solve all our problems by taxing the rich more”
Politicians love to claim that simply raising taxes on the wealthy will generate enough revenue to fund ambitious social programs and balance budgets. However, this oversimplifies a complex issue. While the rich certainly can afford to pay more, there are limits to how much additional revenue higher tax rates can realistically generate.
The truth is that even eliminating the cap on Social Security payroll taxes for high earners would only address a fraction of the program’s long-term funding shortfall (ref).
Meaningful deficit reduction and program expansion require a more comprehensive approach beyond taxing the rich. Politicians who claim otherwise are selling voters an unrealistic quick fix.
2. “Free trade is bad for American workers”
Many politicians blame free trade agreements for job losses and wage stagnation. But this ignores the complex realities of globalization and technological change.
While increased international competition has certainly disrupted some industries, protectionist policies often harm the overall economy more than they benefit it. Freer trade has benefited American consumers through lower prices and greater product variety (ref). It has also created new export opportunities for many U.S. businesses.
Restricting trade may protect some jobs in the short term, but it typically leads to higher costs and reduced economic growth over time. A more nuanced approach is needed to help workers adapt to economic changes.
3. “Raising the minimum wage will kill jobs”
Opponents of minimum wage increases often claim that higher labor costs will force businesses to cut jobs. However, minimum wage hikes have found little to no negative impact on overall employment levels (ref).
While some low-margin businesses may reduce hours or hiring, these effects are generally offset by increased consumer spending and reduced turnover.
Monetary, gradual increases in the minimum wage can boost incomes for low-wage workers without significantly harming job growth. More extreme hikes could have negative effects, but politicians who categorically oppose any minimum wage increase ignore the evidence.
A balanced approach, considering local economic conditions, is most prudent.
4. “Tax cuts always pay for themselves through growth”
Supply-side politicians claim that cutting taxes will stimulate so much economic growth that government revenues will increase. While lower tax rates can boost growth to some degree, there’s little evidence that tax cuts fully pay for themselves, especially at the federal level (ref). Most credible analyses find that tax cuts lead to lower revenues overall.
The truth is that tax policy involves tradeoffs between growth incentives and revenue generation. Some targeted tax reforms may improve efficiency and boost growth. But politicians who promise massive, across-the-board tax cuts will be a free lunch are selling voters a fantasy.
Responsible budgeting requires acknowledging that tax cuts generally need to be offset by spending reductions or other revenue increases.
5. “Social Security is going bankrupt”
Alarmist politicians often claim that Social Security is on the verge of collapse and won’t be there for future retirees. While the program does face long-term funding challenges as the population ages, calling it “bankrupt” is misleading.
Even if no changes are made, Social Security could still pay about 79% of scheduled benefits after depleting trust funds (ref). Relatively modest adjustments to revenues and benefits could ensure Social Security’s long-term solvency. Politicians who fear the program’s demise often try to build support for more dramatic changes or privatization.
Voters should be skeptical of doomsday rhetoric and demand honest discussion of realistic reform options.
6. “Government spending is out of control”
Politicians love to rail against “out of control” government spending, painting a picture of a bloated bureaucracy wasting taxpayer dollars. However, the reality is more nuanced. While there are areas where government spending could be made more efficient, many of the largest expenditures go to essential programs and services that benefit citizens (ref).
For instance, Social Security and Medicare, often cited as prime examples of runaway spending, are, in fact, highly popular programs that provide a crucial safety net for millions of Americans. Cutting these programs would cause real harm to some of society’s most vulnerable members.
Politicians who simplistically call for slashing government spending across the board are often more interested in scoring political points than in having an honest discussion about the role and responsibilities of government.
7. “Immigrants are a drain on the economy”
One of the most persistent economic myths is that immigrants are a net negative for the economy, taking jobs from native-born workers and burdening social services. In reality, the economic impact of immigration is overwhelmingly positive (ref). Immigrants contribute to the economy as workers, consumers, entrepreneurs, and taxpayers.
Immigration has little to no negative effect on the wages or employment levels of native-born workers, even those with low levels of education. They often fill critical gaps in the labor market and contribute to job creation through their entrepreneurship and spending power.
Politicians who scapegoat immigrants for economic woes are not only promoting a false narrative but also undermining the vitality and dynamism that immigration brings to our economy. However, there have been recent illegal immigration issues that do require careful thought.
8. “Unions are bad for the economy”
In recent decades, some politicians and business interests have been concerted in portraying unions as a drag on economic growth and competitiveness. However, the data tells a different story.
Countries with higher unionization rates tend to have lower levels of income inequality, higher wages, and better working conditions (ref). Unions play a vital role in giving workers a collective voice and bargaining power, which helps ensure that economic growth benefits are more evenly distributed.
The decline of unions in the United States has coincided with stagnating wages for middle—and working-class Americans, even as productivity and corporate profits have soared.
Usually politicians who attack unions are often doing the bidding of corporate interests, who want to keep wages low and workers disempowered.
9. “Globalization is a zero-sum game”
In the political rhetoric around trade and globalization, there is often an assumption that the global economy is a zero-sum game – that one country’s gain must come at another’s expense. This simplistic view ignores the reality of the modern, interconnected global economy.
While it’s true that globalization has created winners and losers and that the gains have not been evenly distributed, the overall effect has been to increase global wealth and raise living standards worldwide (ref).
Politicians who promote protectionist policies and trade wars risk economic retaliation and instability and forgoing the benefits of specialization, innovation, and access to global markets that trade provides.
10. “Economic inequality doesn’t matter as long as the pie is growing”
A common refrain from politicians unconcerned about rising economic inequality is that it doesn’t matter as long as the overall economy grows – that a rising tide lifts all boats. However, this argument ignores the real consequences of extreme and growing inequality.
High levels of inequality are associated with lower social mobility, poorer health outcomes, higher crime rates, and political instability. When the gains from economic growth are increasingly concentrated at the top, it undermines social cohesion and the legitimacy of our economic and political systems (ref).
Politicians who dismiss concerns about inequality often serve the interests of their wealthy donors rather than the broader public good.
Read Next:
Martha A. Lavallie
Martha is a journalist with close to a decade of experience in uncovering and reporting on the most compelling stories of our time. Passionate about staying ahead of the curve, she specializes in shedding light on trending topics and captivating global narratives. Her insightful articles have garnered acclaim, making her a trusted voice in today's dynamic media landscape.
